Clicks-Bucks Forum
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

New rules - I don't understand the example

3 posters

Go down

New rules - I don't understand the example Empty New rules - I don't understand the example

Post  GoldSaver Mon May 06, 2013 8:04 am

Hello Admin,
I don't understand the new rules. For me it seems, that it is the same as before, only the maximum per request changed.

I think so because in your example you said upgrading is an investment, right?
But then you add funds $100, so your investment is $200.
And now the problem:
Why do you cashout only $180?

My calculation:
180% of $200 = $360

OK, the maximum per request is $180, but why should I add funds first?
If upgrading is an invesmtent, I don't need to add funds.

My example:
I upgrade to Bucks 100 -> costs $100

So my investment is $100
I can cashout 180%, so my first cashout is about $180

If I always have to add funds first, before I can request payout, it is the same system like before. I don't understand it.

Can you explain it again, please?

Is upgrading an investment?
Have I always to add funds before every payout request?

And what do you mean, that every member can earn 200% of the investment?
In your first message you said 180% - 220%.
So what is it?

Thank you.

Best regard,
GoldSaver

GoldSaver

Posts : 6
Join date : 2013-03-08

Back to top Go down

New rules - I don't understand the example Empty Re: New rules - I don't understand the example

Post  Admin Mon May 06, 2013 7:02 pm

GoldSaver wrote:Hello Admin,
I don't understand the new rules. For me it seems, that it is the same as before, only the maximum per request changed.

I think so because in your example you said upgrading is an investment, right?
But then you add funds $100, so your investment is $200.
And now the problem:
Why do you cashout only $180?

My calculation:
180% of $200 = $360

OK, the maximum per request is $180, but why should I add funds first?
If upgrading is an invesmtent, I don't need to add funds.

My example:
I upgrade to Bucks 100 -> costs $100

So my investment is $100
I can cashout 180%, so my first cashout is about $180

If I always have to add funds first, before I can request payout, it is the same system like before. I don't understand it.

Can you explain it again, please?

Is upgrading an investment?
Have I always to add funds before every payout request?

And what do you mean, that every member can earn 200% of the investment?
In your first message you said 180% - 220%.
So what is it?

Thank you.

Best regard,
GoldSaver
These are the rules that we set up on April 22, now we just set the maximum amount of withdrawal.

Upgrading is not an investment.

Many members did not understand the new rules,
this example, I set up taking into account your investment (Add Funds) and your payment for the upgrade.

The goal is to show all the members how to best use our system earnings

Admin
Admin

Posts : 99
Join date : 2012-12-16

http://www.clicks-bucks.com/

Back to top Go down

New rules - I don't understand the example Empty Re: New rules - I don't understand the example

Post  aqirock Tue May 07, 2013 1:54 am

then admin, it's mean the maximum percent payout for each membership are showing at upgrade page? btw my payout request already 5 days I hope you can proceed it thanks!

aqirock

Posts : 9
Join date : 2013-05-03

Back to top Go down

New rules - I don't understand the example Empty Re: New rules - I don't understand the example

Post  GoldSaver Tue May 07, 2013 5:28 am

Admin wrote:These are the rules that we set up on April 22, now we just set the maximum amount of withdrawal.

Upgrading is not an investment.
...
OK, then it meens the percentage per request is the same as before (for example Bucks 100 180%). The percentage hasn't changed.
But why you have reduced the maximum amount per request?

Before 22. april it was $400 (for Bucks 100) and now it's only $180 (for Bucks 100). And I have to pay fees for payout. Before 22. april there wasn't any payout fees.

Thus, the rules have deteriorated, because I can payout less and I have to pay fees. Crying or Very sad
I hope you will change one of these rules again, because at the moment it is a double deterioration. Shocked

PS: I am also waiting since 7 days for my payout .

GoldSaver

Posts : 6
Join date : 2013-03-08

Back to top Go down

New rules - I don't understand the example Empty Re: New rules - I don't understand the example

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum